This is somewhat embarrassing, isn’t it?
It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try a search?
Anger cannot occur unless you believe that you have been attacked, that your attack is justified in return, and that you are in no way responsible for it. Given these three wholly irrational premises, the equally irrational conclusion that a brother is worthy of attack rather than of love must follow. What can be expected from insane premises except an insane conclusion? (T-6.in.1)
It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try a search?